[Sorry for the delay, catching up after being away] Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> writes: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> I realized this one hasn't made it in, but is really nice. I made a >> number of minor edits (typos, markup, simplifying headings,... among >> others). What do you think -- should we include this? > > Checking mailing list archives I realized that Jakub had provided > feedback ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00987.html ) > that the strict overflow warnings had been fixed. > > Hence I went ahead and committed the removal below.
Thanks for doing this. I noticed a typo while reading it, so I committed the patch below as obvious. Richard Index: porting_to.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 porting_to.html --- porting_to.html 24 Oct 2011 00:57:54 -0000 1.4 +++ porting_to.html 15 Nov 2011 13:38:10 -0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html";>changes</a>. Some of these are a result of bug fixing, and some old behaviors have been intentionally changed in order to support new standards, or relaxed -instandards-conforming ways to facilitate compilation or runtime +in standards-conforming ways to facilitate compilation or runtime performance. Some of these changes are not visible to the naked eye and will not cause problems when updating from older versions. </p>
