> Le 11 mai 2019 à 15:49, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> a écrit :
>
> Hi Dominique,
>
>> How ever adding the new tests is a real PITA!-(
>> Could you improve the naming scheme for them
>
> What should be the preferrred naming scheme for a
> test that is split? I'm open to suggestions (but also,
> the naming convention should not matter once the test
> cases are committed).
Well, when the naming I use for testing does not correspond to the one
committed I have to clean the mess!-(
You have attachments for typebound_assignment_5a.f90 and
typebound_assignment_6a.f90
It would be nice to have similar attachments for the other splits. Also I can
guess the names for
the new tests, but it would help to have them in the same order as in the mail.
(I think you should really use the +N option for the diff).
Dominique
>
> Regards
>
> Thomas
