On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:19:15PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > The regression testing for the patch was done on GCC mainline on
> >
> > powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 9 LE)
> >
> > with no regressions. Is it OK for trunk and backport to gcc 9 ?
While the posted patch had:
> > +/* PR tree-optimization/88676 */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = PHI <" "optimized" } } */
the actually committed patch has:
/* PR tree-optimization/88676 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-phiopt1" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = PHI <" "optimized" } } */
Dunno why this changed, if you want it in phiopt1, you need "phiopt1"
in scan-tree-dump-not as well, if you want optimized dump, you need
-fdump-tree-optimized instead.
>
> This new testcase fails on arm and aarch64:
> PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c (test for excess errors)
> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized " = PHI
> <"
> because:
> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c: dump file does not exist
>
> Can you fix this?
Jakub
