Hi, When suggesting to rewrite the unsafe (with respect to multiple evaluation of arguments) macro definition: ... #define max(a,b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b)) ... into the safe macro definition: ... #define maxint(a,b) \ ({int _a = (a), _b = (b); _a > _b ? _a : _b; }) ... mention the variable shadowing problem for: ... #define maxint3(a, b, c) \ ({int _a = (a), _b = (b), _c = (c); maxint (maxint (_a, _b), _c); }) ...
Any comments? Thanks, - Tom [doc] Note variable shadowing at max macro using statement expression 2019-04-08 Tom de Vries <tdevr...@suse.de> * doc/extend.texi (@node Statement Exprs): Note variable shadowing at max macro using statement expression. --- gcc/doc/extend.texi | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index 8e0deac26c3..27ed0fb014f 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -143,13 +143,34 @@ follows: But this definition computes either @var{a} or @var{b} twice, with bad results if the operand has side effects. In GNU C, if you know the type of the operands (here taken as @code{int}), you can define -the macro safely as follows: +the macro safe (from evaluating operands more than once) as follows: @smallexample #define maxint(a,b) \ (@{int _a = (a), _b = (b); _a > _b ? _a : _b; @}) @end smallexample +Note that introducing variable declarations (as we do in maxint) can +cause variable shadowing, so while this example using the max macro will +produce correct results: +@smallexample +int _a = 1, _b = 2, c; +c = max (_a, _b); +@end smallexample +this example using maxint will not: +@smallexample +int _a = 1, _b = 2, c; +c = maxint (_a, _b); +@end smallexample + +This problem may for instance occur when we use this pattern recursively, like +so: + +@smallexample +#define maxint3(a, b, c) \ + (@{int _a = (a), _b = (b), _c = (c); maxint (maxint (_a, _b), _c); @}) +@end smallexample + Embedded statements are not allowed in constant expressions, such as the value of an enumeration constant, the width of a bit-field, or the initial value of a static variable.