On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> DR 1321 clarified that two dependent names are equivalent if the names are
> the same, even if the result of name lookup is different.  So template
> argument hashing should treat a lookup set like a plain identifier.
> Mangling already does.

Actually, let's handle this more like cp_tree_equal does, i.e. only in
the context of a CALL_EXPR.

Attachment: 86946-patch2
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to