> But you should not see such an expression in gimple. The array index is > always a gimple_val.
I'm not sure what you mean. The expression array[i+1] compiles to the following (courtesy of dump-tree-ssa): D.2095_4 = (long unsigned int) i_1; D.2096_5 = D.2095_4 + 1; D.2097_6 = D.2096_5 * 4; D.2098_8 = array_7(D) + D.2097_6; Annotalysis canonicalizes this gimple code into a tree that includes a PLUS_EXPR, a MULT_EXPR, and a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. -DeLesley