On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:50:26PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 3/8/19 1:44 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Intel guys, we've done some re-measurement in PR86952
> >> about usage of jump tables when retpolines are used.
> >> Numbers prove that disabling of JT should be the best for now.
> >>
> >> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
> >>
> >> Ready to be installed?
> >
> > OK, thanks!
> > I wonder if there is some threshold for extremely large jumptables where
> > branchy sequence will loose, but I think it is better to disable them
> > than what we have right now.
>
> I tested switch statements up to 4096 and it was still slower ;)
Try one with 10000000 of entries ;) and also compare code size and data
segment size.
Jakub
