On 3/6/19 8:56 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/6/19 8:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Which means you can write it as just
>>
>> static int
>> matching_constraint_num (const char *constraint)
>> {
>> if (*constraint == '%')
>> constraint++;
>>
>> if (IN_RANGE (*constraint, '0', '9'))
>> return strtoul (constraint, NULL, 10);
>>
>> return -1;
>> }
>
> Ok, changed. Thanks!...and re-bootstrapping and regtesting were clean with that change. Peter
