On 9 November 2011 23:32, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > When a bool store gets a pattern stmt, we need to update > DR_STMT (otherwise the original rather than replaced stmts > are used e.g. for interleaving etc.). > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, testcase > tested on powerpc64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. Thanks, Ira > > 2011-11-09 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR tree-optimization/51000 > * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_bool_pattern): If adding > a pattern stmt for a bool store, adjust DR_STMT too. > Don't handle bool conversions to single bit precision lhs. > * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_remove_stores): If next is a pattern > stmt, remove its related stmt and free its stmt_vinfo. > (free_stmt_vec_info): Free also pattern stmt's vinfo and > pattern def stmt's vinfo. > * tree-vect-loop.c (destroy_loop_vec_info): Don't try to > free pattern stmt's vinfo here. > (vect_transform_loop): When calling vect_remove_stores, > do gsi_next first and don't call gsi_remove. If not strided > store, free stmt vinfo for gsi_stmt (si) rather than stmt. > > * gcc.dg/vect/pr51000.c: New test. > > > Jakub >
