On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:23:37PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> It's not clear to me what the rules are on backports (do
> I need approval, or re-review?) but the following have
> all been bootstrapped and regression-tested relative to
> today's gcc-8-branch (on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu):
>
> r259720: "Don't offer suggestions for compiler-generated variables (PR
> c++/85515)"
> r262199: "C++: don't offer bogus "._0" suggestions (PR c++/86329)"
> r263275: "Fix memory leak of pretty_printer prefixes"
> r263295: "docs: fix stray duplicated words"
> r263339: "Fix memory leak in selftest::test_expansion_to_rtl"
> r267957: "Fix ICE on class-template argument deduction (PR c++/88795)"
> r268847: "C++ concepts: fix ICE with requires on dtors (PR c++/89036)"
>
> Are these OK for gcc-8-branch?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
