Hi Stefan,

On 09/02/19 16:25, Stefan Agner wrote:
Hi Kyrill,

On 10.01.2019 12:38, Kyrill  Tkachov wrote:
Hi Stefan,

On 08/01/19 09:33, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Stefan,

On 01/01/19 23:34, Stefan Agner wrote:
This allows to use unified asm syntax when compiling for the
ARM instruction. This matches documentation and seems what the
initial patch was intended doing when the flag got added.
---
  gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 3419b6bd0f8..67b2b199f3f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -3095,7 +3095,8 @@ arm_option_override_internal (struct gcc_options *opts,

    /* Thumb2 inline assembly code should always use unified syntax.
       This will apply to ARM and Thumb1 eventually.  */
-  opts->x_inline_asm_unified = TARGET_THUMB2_P (opts->x_target_flags);
+  if (TARGET_THUMB2_P (opts->x_target_flags))
+    opts->x_inline_asm_unified = true;
This looks right to me and is the logic we had in GCC 5.
How has this patch been tested?

Can you please provide a ChangeLog entry for this patch[1].

I've bootstrapped and tested this, together with your testsuite patch
on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
and committed both with r267804 with the following ChangeLog entries:

2019-01-10  Stefan Agner  <ste...@agner.ch>

     PR target/88648
     * config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override_internal): Force
     opts->x_inline_asm_unified to true only if TARGET_THUMB2_P.

2019-01-10  Stefan Agner  <ste...@agner.ch>

     PR target/88648
     * gcc.target/arm/pr88648-asm-syntax-unified.c: Add test to
     check if -masm-syntax-unified gets applied properly.

Thank you for the patch. If you plan to contribute more patches in the
future I suggest you
sort out the copyright assignment paperwork.

I believe this fix needs to be backported to the branches.
I'll do so after a few days of testing on trunk.
Thanks for applying the patch! As far as I can see it did not made it
into the branch yet, do you think it can get backported there too?

Thanks for reminding me. I've now committed your patch and the test to the 
gcc-8 branch with r268764.

Kyrill

--
Stefan

Thanks again,
Kyrill

Thanks,
Kyrill

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

  #ifdef SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_INTERNAL_OPTIONS
    SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_INTERNAL_OPTIONS;
--
2.20.1


Reply via email to