On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:22:58AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:48:57PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > Here's what the revised approach looks like, but without using new > > unspecs. Bootstrap and regression test on powerpc64le-linux and > > powerpc64-linux biarch completed, and testing on powerpc64le-linux > > with -mno-tls-markers. powerpc64-linux -mno-tls-markers testing still > > in progress. OK? > > This is easier to grok, thanks.
Yes, and not having to edit __tls_get_addr call patterns is good too. > I think this would be nicer if you still used insn alternatives here. > What is needed for that? A new symbol constraint especially for __tls_get_addr? Actually two new constraints for ppc64, one for small model, the other for medium/large! No way. > The patch is okay for trunk (if it survives on at least all three linux > targets). Thanks! Happily it did, even with -mno-tls-markers. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
