Hi Kewen,

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 09:27:38PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion, I just had a testing on BE machine and found the 
> vector double related codes also need to be separated to vsx case. The case 
> has been updated as below, is it OK for trunk? 

Yes, this is fine.  Thanks!

A changelog suggestion:

> 2019-01-19  Kewen Lin  <li...@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr.c: Remove.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr-1.c: New test.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr-2.c: Ditto.

Maybe you can say this like

        * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr.c: Delete, split into ...
        * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr-1.c: ... this, new test ...
        * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec_vld_vst_addr-2.c: ... and this.  New test.

It's fine with or without that.


Segher

Reply via email to