On 1/8/19 2:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: >> Changed that. I verified that tree-ssa.exp tests work fine. May I install >> the hunk you suggested >> without testing? > > I think better would be commit without that hunk and when you bootstrap next > time, test that and commit (preapproved) that hunk.
I'll re-run the bootstrap with the hunk. > > That said, have you looked at the other mail I've posted (TYPE_PRECISION > (index_type) > TYPE_PRECISION (elt0))? > The way contains_linear_function_p is written it does the checks in the type > that will do it at runtime, so I'm just wondering if there are cases where > doing it in the wider type could optimize something that the narrower one > can't. Perhaps there are none. I replied that in previous email. Martin > > Jakub >
