On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 11:48:15PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_alias.f90 -Os execution test > > > > I see this failure on trunk as well, but I don't think it was > > introduced by my commit. Instead, I see I it starting with r267601: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=267601 > > > > Jan, could you please have a look? > > Actually I have noticed about half an hour ago that i commited WIP > variant of the patch. It is fixed by this patch > > I apologize for the breakage. > > Index: ChangeLog > =================================================================== > --- ChangeLog (revision 267602) > +++ ChangeLog (working copy) > @@ -1,5 +1,15 @@ > 2019-01-05 Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> > > + * doc/invoke.texi (max-inline-insns-small): New parameters. > + * ipa-inline.c (want_early_inline_function_p): simplify. > + (want_inline_small_function_p): Fix pasto from previous patch; > + use max-inline-insns-small bound. > + * params.def (max-inline-insns-small): New param. > + * ipa-fnsummary.c (analyze_function_body): Initialize time/size > + variables correctly. > +
/gfortran.dg/pr79966.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never -O -O2 -fpeel-loops -finline-functions -fipa-cp-clone -fdump-ipa-inline-details -S -o pr79966.s PASS: gfortran.dg/pr79966.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79966.f90 -O scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/[0-9]+ into runtptests/[0-9]+" testcase /safe/sgk/gcc/gccx/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp completed in 0 seconds on x86_64-*-freebsd. -- steve
