On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:13:13PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I'd expect testcases to be added for the new syntax variants (duplicate
> qualifiers / goto and new orderings thereof).
Okay.
> There's a description of the syntax in extend.texi:
>
> @example
> asm @r{[}volatile@r{]} ( @var{AssemblerTemplate}
> : @var{OutputOperands}
> @r{[} : @var{InputOperands}
> @r{[} : @var{Clobbers} @r{]} @r{]})
>
> asm @r{[}volatile@r{]} goto ( @var{AssemblerTemplate}
> :
> : @var{InputOperands}
> : @var{Clobbers}
> : @var{GotoLabels})
> @end example
>
> I'd expect this to be updated by this patch, and again by the "asm inline"
> one.
That stuff needs to be rewritten :-(
But I'll see what I can do.
> What's the basis for allowing duplicates for C but not for C++?
It is the status quo. It would make sense to allow duplicates for C++ as
well, sure. If that is preferred I can make a patch for it?
Segher
