Hi, On 15/11/18 15:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
How about using location_of instead of DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION?
Well, we know that VAR_P is true of that DECL tree node, thus I don't see how location_of would be better. Certainly is more complex.
Paolo.
Hi, On 15/11/18 15:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
How about using location_of instead of DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION?
Well, we know that VAR_P is true of that DECL tree node, thus I don't see how location_of would be better. Certainly is more complex.
Paolo.