On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:34 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/8/18 9:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:42 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Stupid boring changes. > >> > >> OK? > > > > Well, IMHO using m_min is making clear you are accessing a member > > while using min () does not. > > There is already prior art here. I believe I discussed this before and > committed some bits like this. > > > > > So no, please do not make this kind of changes? > > It also makes it easier for my work going forward. So not technically > needed, but it would make my life easier as I change the min/max > implementation in the distant future. Please?
Hmfp :/ OK > Aldy
