Hello global GCC reviewers,
Would it be possible to apply the reviewed patch below?
Thank you,
Fredrik
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:33:33PM +0200, Fredrik Noring wrote:
> The Linux kernel requires and emulates LL and SC for the R5900 too. The
> special --without-llsc default for the R5900 is therefore not applicable
> in that case.
>
> Reviewed-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@linux-mips.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Double spacing instead of single spacing in commit message
>
> ---
> gcc/config.gcc | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
> index 720e6a7373d..68c34b16123 100644
> --- a/gcc/config.gcc
> +++ b/gcc/config.gcc
> @@ -3711,14 +3711,14 @@ fi
> # Infer a default setting for --with-llsc.
> if test x$with_llsc = x; then
> case ${target} in
> - mips64r5900-*-* | mips64r5900el-*-* | mipsr5900-*-* | mipsr5900el-*-*)
> - # The R5900 doesn't support LL(D) and SC(D).
> - with_llsc=no
> - ;;
> mips*-*-linux*)
> # The kernel emulates LL and SC where necessary.
> with_llsc=yes
> ;;
> + mips64r5900-*-* | mips64r5900el-*-* | mipsr5900-*-* | mipsr5900el-*-*)
> + # The R5900 doesn't support LL(D) and SC(D).
> + with_llsc=no
> + ;;
> esac
> fi
>
> --
> 2.18.1
>
