> On 26 October 2018 09:18:39 CEST, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: > > @@ -1094,10 +1133,15 @@ warn_types_mismatch (tree t1, tree t2, l > gcc_assert (TYPE_NAME (t1) && TYPE_NAME (t2) > && TREE_CODE (TYPE_NAME (t1)) == TYPE_DECL > && TREE_CODE (TYPE_NAME (t2)) == TYPE_DECL); > + tree n1 = TYPE_NAME (t1); > + tree n2 = TYPE_NAME (t2); > + if (TREE_CODE (n1) == TYPE_DECL) > + n1 = DECL_NAME (n1); > + if (TREE_CODE (n2) == TYPE_DECL) > + n1 = DECL_NAME (n2); > /* Most of the time, the type names will match, do not be unnecesarily > verbose. */ > > Typo? > Please explain why you don't set n2 but overwrite n1?
Yep, it was a typo. I already fixed it in a followup patch... honza > > thanks,
