On 10/24/2018 06:22 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:But if you do want to avoid the attribute on declarations of these functions regardless it should be safe to add it after the declaration in the .c file, like so: __hidden_ver1 (strcmp, __GI_strcmp, __redirect_strcmp) __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"), copy (strcmp)));The obvious question there is whether the glibc patch should use copy (local) as well as copy (name) in the definition of __hidden_ver1.
I tried copy(local) but it breaks where local isn't declared. I think errno_location was the first one I saw where it referred to __GI__something_or_other that was previously only defined via an asm. Martin
