On 9/27/18 6:07 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > I do have an additional concern that I forgot to mention in Vancouver - > > Thanks Wilco for reminding me that this now replaces a bunch of inline > instructions with effectively a library call therefore clobbering a whole > bunch > of caller saved registers.
We did talk about this in Vancouver, including perhaps providing a private interface. At the time you brushed it off and asked why I couldn't just write the helpers in C. I guess we can talk about a private interface after we see what the total overhead is with it as it is. r~
