On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 4:34 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:08 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:09 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:23 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:11 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:58 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu...@intel.com> writes:
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82699-4.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>>>>>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { *-*-linux* && { ! ia32 } } } } */
>>>>>>>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic -fcf-protection -mcet -pg -mfentry
>>>>>>>> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" } */
>>>>>>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\t\.cfi_startproc\n\tendbr} 1 }
>>>>>>>> } */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would add test cases for -mnop-mcount and -mrecord-mcount too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the updated patch to add a testcase for -mnop-mcount
>>>>>> -mrecord-mcount.
>>>>>> No other changes otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PING:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01741.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PING.
>>>
>>> PING.
>>>
>>
>> PING.
>
> Hi, Jan Uros,
>
> Can you review this patch?
I don't know CET stuff, so I'm not able to review functionality of CET patches.
Uros.
