On 17/09/18 21:24 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Do other compilers besides gcc suppress the same way?
No, clang doesn't:
What version is that? I didn't test on this exact patch, but clang 6 and
7 print, for similar code:
warning: generalized initializer lists are a C++11 extension
[-Wc++11-extensions]
Ah, with the exact code I do get an error indeed. I'll change the code :-(
Thanks. I feel your pain, but I think we'd need a better reason to
break it (the valid C++98 code is uglier but not too painful).
The cbegin() change can still use C++11 syntax.
So I do think we should stick to C++98 syntax.
What is the oldest version of clang we are supposed to support? I
thought historically we mostly supported whatever version of clang was
released *after* (i.e. clang does the support).
--
Marc Glisse
