On 10/31/11 10:11, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> I'm suggesting a new patch, as attached. Before reload_completed, we >> directly return 0 upon nlabel == NULL, which should be identical with >> old behavior, while asserting fail if after reload (where we assume the >> simple_return/return distinction is required). >> >> This should ensure better that, if a post-prologue case of redirecting >> to the exit block ever happens we will more easily know (by some future >> PR :P) >> >> Bootstrapped and tested on i686, and cross tested on ARM using QEMU. >> Eric, is this approach okay? > > Don't you want epilogue_completed instead of reload_completed? Otherwise, > yes, the approach is fine with me, but wait for Bernd's input.
That looks good to me too. Bernd
