...by stripping use of some obsolete features and adding missing
table cells (<td></td>).

Committed.

Gerald

Index: gcc-3.0/criteria.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.0/criteria.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.34 criteria.html
--- gcc-3.0/criteria.html       1 Sep 2018 23:42:02 -0000       1.34
+++ gcc-3.0/criteria.html       2 Sep 2018 16:55:04 -0000
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
 
 <body>
 
-<p><big>This document is obsolete and kept for historical reference
-only.</big></p>
+<p>This document is obsolete and kept for historical reference
+only.</p>
 
 <h1>GCC 3.0 Release Criteria</h1>
 
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 systems and the most popular microprocessors.  Of course, where
 possible, the release will support other targets as well.</p>
 
-<table align="center">
+<table>
 <caption>Primary Evaluation Platforms</caption>
 <tr><th>Chip</th>     <th>OS</th>                  <th>Triplet</th></tr>
 <tr><td>Alpha</td>    <td>Red Hat Linux 6.2</td>   <td></td></tr>
@@ -150,18 +150,22 @@
 team, will make reasonable efforts to assist these volunteers by
 answering questions and reviewing patches as time permits.</p>
 
-<table align="center">
+<table>
 <caption>Secondary Evaluation Platforms</caption>
 <tr><th>Chip</th>     <th>OS</th>                  <th>Triplet</th>
     <th>Tester</th></tr>
 <tr><td>Intel x86</td><td>FreeBSD 4.2</td>         
<td>i386-unknown-freebsd4.2</td>
     <td><a href="mailto:obr...@freebsd.org";>David O'Brien</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>PowerPC</td>  <td>GNU/Linux</td>           <td></td></tr>
-<tr><td>SPARC</td>    <td>SunOS 4.1.4</td>         
<td>sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4</td></tr>
+<tr><td>PowerPC</td>  <td>GNU/Linux</td>           <td></td>
+    <td></td></tr>
+<tr><td>SPARC</td>    <td>SunOS 4.1.4</td>         
<td>sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4</td>
+    <td></td></tr>
 <tr><td>SPARC</td>    <td>Debian GNU/Linux 2.2</td><td>sparc-linux</td>
     <td><a href="mailto:bcoll...@debian.org";>Ben Collins</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>ARM</td>      <td>GNU/Linux</td>           
<td>armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu</td></tr>
-<tr><td>Intel x86</td><td>Cygwin</td>              <td>i686-pc-cygwin</td></tr>
+<tr><td>ARM</td>      <td>GNU/Linux</td>           
<td>armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu</td>
+    <td></td></tr>
+<tr><td>Intel x86</td><td>Cygwin</td>              <td>i686-pc-cygwin</td>
+    <td></td></tr>
 </table>
 
 <h2>Language Support</h2>
@@ -214,7 +218,7 @@
 and high-level code, of numerical and logical programs, and of
 different programming languages.</p>
 
-<table align="center">
+<table>
 <caption>Integration Tests</caption>
 <tr><th>Name</th>
     <th>Language</th>
@@ -292,18 +296,22 @@
 previous releases.  Therefore, we will use the following benchmarks
 for measuring code quality:</p>
 
-<table align="center">
+<table>
 <tr><th>Name</th>
     <th>Language</th>
     <th>Source URL</th>
 </tr>
-<tr><td>gzip 1.2.4a</td><td>C</td>
+<tr><td>gzip 1.2.4a</td>
+    <td>C</td>
+    <td></td>
 </tr>
-<tr><td>Stepanov</td><td>C++</td>
+<tr><td>Stepanov</td>
+    <td>C++</td>
     <td><a href="ftp://ftp.kai.com/pub/benchmarks/stepanov_v1p2.C";>
          stepanov_v1p2.C</a></td>
 </tr>
-<tr><td>LAPACK</td><td>Fortran</td>
+<tr><td>LAPACK</td>
+    <td>Fortran</td>
     <td><a href="http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack.tgz";>
         LAPACK 3.0 (timing programs)</a></td>
 </tr>
@@ -351,9 +359,9 @@
         statement; it is a reasonable benchmark for testing flow
         optimizations and for handling large functions.</td>
 </tr>
-<tr><td></td><td>C++</td>
+<tr><td></td><td>C++</td><td></td><td></td><td></td>
 </tr>
-<tr><td></td><td>Fortran</td>
+<tr><td></td><td>Fortran</td><td></td><td></td><td></td>
 </tr>
 </table>
 

Reply via email to