> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > this patch should fix merging of PIC and PIE options so we always resort
> > to the least common denominator of the object files compiled (i.e. 
> > linking together -fpic and -fPIE will result in -fpie binary).
> > Note that we also use information about format of output passed by linker
> > plugin so we will disable pic/pie when resulting binary is not relocatable.
> > However for shared libraries and pie we want to pick right mode that makes
> > sense.
> > 
> > I wrote simple script that tries all possible options of combining two 
> > files.
> > Mode picked is specified in the output file.
> > 
> > To support targets that default to pic/pie well, I had to also hack
> > lto_write_options to always stream what mode was used in the given file.
> > 
> > lto-bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
> > 
> > Honza
> > 
> >     PR lto/86517
> >     * lto-opts.c (lto_write_options): Always stream PIC/PIE mode.
> >     * lto-wrapper.c (merge_and_complain): Fix merging of PIC/PIE
> > Index: lto-opts.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- lto-opts.c      (revision 263356)
> > +++ lto-opts.c      (working copy)
> > @@ -78,6 +78,22 @@ lto_write_options (void)
> >        && !global_options.x_flag_openacc)
> >      append_to_collect_gcc_options (&temporary_obstack, &first_p,
> >                                "-fno-openacc");
> > +  /* Append PIC/PIE mode because its default depends on target and it is
> > +     subject of merging in lto-wrapper.  */
> > +  if ((!global_options_set.x_flag_pic || global_options.x_flag_pic == 0)
> 
> why's that checked only for flag_pic?
> Shouldn't it be consistent with flag_pie?
> 
> Isn't it so that setting either -f[no-]pic or -f[no-]pie fully specifies
> the state?  So the == 0 check is superfluous?

Yep, it is superflows. I have changed it to test if at least one option is set,
re-tested and going to commit.

OK for release branch after some soaking?
Honza

> 
> The rest of the patch looks OK to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> > +      && !global_options_set.x_flag_pie)
> > +    {
> > +       append_to_collect_gcc_options (&temporary_obstack, &first_p,
> > +                                 global_options.x_flag_pic == 2
> > +                                 ? "-fPIC"
> > +                                 : global_options.x_flag_pic == 1
> > +                                 ? "-fpic"
> > +                                 : global_options.x_flag_pie == 2
> > +                                 ? "-fPIE"
> > +                                 : global_options.x_flag_pie == 1
> > +                                 ? "-fpie"
> > +                                 : "-fno-pie");
> > +    }
> >  
> >    /* Append options from target hook and store them to offload_lto 
> > section.  */
> >    if (lto_stream_offload_p)
> > Index: lto-wrapper.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- lto-wrapper.c   (revision 263356)
> > +++ lto-wrapper.c   (working copy)
> > @@ -408,6 +408,11 @@ merge_and_complain (struct cl_decoded_op
> >       It is a common mistake to mix few -fPIC compiled objects into 
> > otherwise
> >       non-PIC code.  We do not want to build everything with PIC then.
> >  
> > +     Similarly we merge PIE options, however in addition we keep
> > +      -fPIC + -fPIE = -fPIE
> > +      -fpic + -fPIE = -fpie
> > +      -fPIC/-fpic + -fpie = -fpie
> > +
> >       It would be good to warn on mismatches, but it is bit hard to do as
> >       we do not know what nothing translates to.  */
> >      
> > @@ -415,11 +420,38 @@ merge_and_complain (struct cl_decoded_op
> >      if ((*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIC
> >          || (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fpic)
> >        {
> > -   if (!pic_option
> > -       || (pic_option->value > 0) != ((*decoded_options)[j].value > 0))
> > -     remove_option (decoded_options, j, decoded_options_count);
> > -   else if (pic_option->opt_index == OPT_fPIC
> > -            && (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fpic)
> > +   /* -fno-pic in one unit implies -fno-pic everywhere.  */
> > +   if ((*decoded_options)[j].value == 0)
> > +     j++;
> > +   /* If we have no pic option or merge in -fno-pic, we still may turn
> > +      existing pic/PIC mode into pie/PIE if -fpie/-fPIE is present.  */
> > +   else if ((pic_option && pic_option->value == 0)
> > +            || !pic_option)
> > +     {
> > +       if (pie_option)
> > +         {
> > +           bool big = (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIC
> > +                      && pie_option->opt_index == OPT_fPIE;
> > +           (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index = big ? OPT_fPIE : OPT_fpie;
> > +           if (pie_option->value)
> > +             (*decoded_options)[j].canonical_option[0] = big ? "-fPIE" : 
> > "-fpie";
> > +           else
> > +             (*decoded_options)[j].canonical_option[0] = big ? "-fno-pie" 
> > : "-fno-pie";
> > +           (*decoded_options)[j].value = pie_option->value;
> > +           j++;
> > +         }
> > +       else if (pic_option)
> > +         {
> > +           (*decoded_options)[j] = *pic_option;
> > +           j++;
> > +         }
> > +       /* We do not know if target defaults to pic or not, so just remove
> > +          option if it is missing in one unit but enabled in other.  */
> > +       else
> > +         remove_option (decoded_options, j, decoded_options_count);
> > +     }
> > +   else if (pic_option->opt_index == OPT_fpic
> > +            && (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIC)
> >       {
> >         (*decoded_options)[j] = *pic_option;
> >         j++;
> > @@ -430,11 +462,42 @@ merge_and_complain (struct cl_decoded_op
> >     else if ((*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIE
> >              || (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fpie)
> >        {
> > -   if (!pie_option
> > -       || pie_option->value != (*decoded_options)[j].value)
> > -     remove_option (decoded_options, j, decoded_options_count);
> > -   else if (pie_option->opt_index == OPT_fPIE
> > -            && (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fpie)
> > +   /* -fno-pie in one unit implies -fno-pie everywhere.  */
> > +   if ((*decoded_options)[j].value == 0)
> > +     j++;
> > +   /* If we have no pie option or merge in -fno-pie, we still preserve
> > +      PIE/pie if pic/PIC is present.  */
> > +   else if ((pie_option && pie_option->value == 0)
> > +            || !pie_option)
> > +     {
> > +       /* If -fPIC/-fpic is given, merge it with -fPIE/-fpie.  */
> > +       if (pic_option)
> > +         {
> > +           if (pic_option->opt_index == OPT_fpic
> > +               && (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIE)
> > +             {
> > +               (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index = OPT_fpie;
> > +               (*decoded_options)[j].canonical_option[0]
> > +                    = pic_option->value ? "-fpie" : "-fno-pie";
> > +             }
> > +           else if (!pic_option->value)
> > +             (*decoded_options)[j].canonical_option[0] = "-fno-pie";
> > +           (*decoded_options)[j].value = pic_option->value;
> > +           j++;
> > +         }
> > +       else if (pie_option)
> > +         {
> > +           (*decoded_options)[j] = *pie_option;
> > +           j++;
> > +         }
> > +       /* Because we always append pic/PIE options this code path should
> > +          not happen unless the LTO object was built by old lto1 which
> > +          did not contain that logic yet.  */
> > +       else
> > +         remove_option (decoded_options, j, decoded_options_count);
> > +     }
> > +   else if (pie_option->opt_index == OPT_fpie
> > +            && (*decoded_options)[j].opt_index == OPT_fPIE)
> >       {
> >         (*decoded_options)[j] = *pie_option;
> >         j++;
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
> 21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to