On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 09:48:50AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Sorry about that, I did run a full bootstrap on x86, but I had the x86
> mitigation patch applied, so it didn't trip this.
Also, I see
FAIL: c-c++-common/spec-barrier-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/spec-barrier-1.c -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/spec-barrier-1.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/spec-barrier-1.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
If some targets are expected to emit a warning on this test and you don't
want to maintain exact list of targets which warn in the testsuite,
shouldn't the test use -w in dg-options?
Jakub
