On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> 2017-04-27 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
>>
>> * doc/gcov.texi: Enhance documentation of gcov.
> Since I started picking on this change set I might as well keep
> at it ;) Just a tiny nit: the sentence is missing a preposition:
>
> depending <ins>on </ins> whether a basic block is reachable.
This adds a bit more. Applied.
(This section still needs a bit more love, ideally by a native
speaker.)
Gerald
2018-07-22 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
* doc/gcov.texi (Invoking Gcov): Editorial changes.
Index: doc/gcov.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gcov.texi (revision 262161)
+++ doc/gcov.texi (working copy)
@@ -378,12 +378,12 @@
containing no code. Unexecuted lines are marked @samp{#####} or
@samp{=====}, depending on whether they are reachable by
non-exceptional paths or only exceptional paths such as C++ exception
-handlers, respectively. Given @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
+handlers, respectively. Given the @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
marked @samp{$$$$$} or @samp{%%%%%}, depending on whether a basic block
is reachable via non-exceptional or exceptional paths.
Executed basic blocks having a statement with zero @var{execution_count}
-end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with @option{-k}
-option. The functionality is not supported in Ada.
+end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with
+the @option{-k} option. This functionality is not supported in Ada.
Note that GCC can completely remove the bodies of functions that are
not needed -- for instance if they are inlined everywhere. Such functions
