On 19 July 2018 at 20:18, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This removes some seemingly redundant conditions from a few traits. If
> __is_trivially_assignable correctly checks the assignable condition as
> well as triviality, then we don't need is_assignable explicitly.  Does
> anybody see a problem with that

It should work; if it doesn't, that's a bug in the compiler. Both
is_constructible
and is_assignable and trivial variants thereof go to the same
"is_xible" code path,
so it should be fair for the library to expect that it all works. In
case it doesn't,
that's something that I will fix in the front-end.

> I added some extra tests for cases that had been problematic with
> __is_trivially_constructible.

That seems reasonable; some of those tests are now duplicated on the
compiler side,
but I think that's fine.

Reply via email to