On 07/03/2018 01:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 07/03/2018 10:53 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> Thank you Jeff. >> >> I found some issues when doing build of all targets >> (contrib/config-list.mk). >> I'll update patch and test that affected cross-compilers still produce >> same output. > > Hello. > > I'm done with testing, I bootstrapped and regtested the patch on > x86_64-linux and ppc64-linux-gnu. > I also build all cross compilers we have in contrib/config-list.mk and I > verified that > results for gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/params/blocksort-part.c source file > is equal for all cross compilers > that I touched in the patch. I tested these options: > > -O2 > -O2 -falign-loops=256 > -O2 -falign-loops=256 -falign-functions=512 -falign-labels=1024 > -falign-jumps=2048 > -O2 -falign-loops=1024 -falign-functions=512 -falign-jumps=2048 > -O2 -falign-loops=256 -falign-jumps=2048 > -O2 -falign-loops=100 -falign-functions=200 -falign-labels=300 > -falign-jumps=400 > -O2 -falign-loops=1111 -falign-functions=1112 -falign-labels=1113 > -falign-jumps=1114 > > there are no issues except one that are present on current trunk: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86394 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86390 > > Is the patchset still ready for approval? Yes.
jeff
