On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, Marek Polacek wrote: > This PR reports that we are not emitting a -Wc90-c99-compat warning > for a for loop with a declaration. This patch adds it; here we want > to use pedwarn_c90 which takes care of it. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. (This wasn't present originally because actually using this construct in C90 mode produces a hard error as it's problematic without the C99 block scopes - that is, this pedwarn_c90 is needed only for -Wc90-c99-compat, not for conformance in C90 mode.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
