Ok.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 3:14 PM Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:51:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > If we're going to allow it with a pedwarn, we shouldn't clobber the
> > > decl with an error_mark_node.
> > >
> > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 8.
> >
> > I got
> >
> >
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test/src-8/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C:8:18:
> > error: range-based 'for' loops only available with -std=c++11 or
> > -std=gnu++11^M
> >
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test/src-8/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C:8:18:
> > error: forming reference to reference type 'int (&)[3]'^M
> > compiler exited with status 1
> > PASS: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C -std=c++98 (test for errors, line 8)
> > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> > Excess errors:
> >
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test/src-8/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C:8:18:
> > error: forming reference to reference type 'int (&)[3]'
>
> Jason, ok to fix with this one?
>
> 2018-06-07 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C: Adjust dg-error.
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for9.C
> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
> void test()
> {
> int a[] = {0,1,2};
> - for (int x : a) // { dg-error "range-based 'for'" }
> + for (int x : a) // { dg-error "range-based 'for'|forming reference" }
> ;
> }
>
