Hi, Jeff, Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
I have updated my patch based on your suggestion, and retested this whole patch on both X86 and aarch64. please take a look at the patch again. thanks. Qing > On May 25, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > So I originally thought you had the core logic wrong in the immediate > uses loop. But it's actually the case that the return value is the > exact opposite of what I expected. > > ie, I expected "TRUE" to mean the call was transformed, "FALSE" if it > was not transformed. > > Can you fix that so it's not so confusing? > > I think with that change we'll be good to go, but please repost for a > final looksie. > > THanks, > Jeff
0001-2nd-Patch-for-PR78009.patch
Description: Binary data
