On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:38:21PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018, Richard Biener wrote: > > > Yeah. Not sure if we need sth other than FLOAT_MODE or if avoiding the > > chaining in wider mode and friends is enough. I guess one could also > > change IFmode to be a non-scalar, composite mode - a different 'kind' of > > complex mode maybe... > > I'm pretty sure you want FOR_EACH_MODE_IN_CLASS (mode, MODE_FLOAT) to > include IFmode, as otherwise all such iterators now present or added in > future would probably need to be changed to include the new type of mode > as well.
Yes. I think trying to change it to a non-scalar composite mode would likely be much more work. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
