Dne sreda, 25. april 2018 ob 19:53:08 CEST je Andreas Schwab napisal(a): > On Apr 25 2018, Matija Skala <msk...@gmx.com> wrote: > > diff --git a/libvtv/configure.ac b/libvtv/configure.ac > > index ba3009ee3fb..878ba02a2e2 100644 > > --- a/libvtv/configure.ac > > +++ b/libvtv/configure.ac > > @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([__secure_getenv]) > > > > AC_GNU_SOURCE > > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([secure_getenv]) > > > > +AC_GNU_SOURCE > > +AC_CHECK_FUNCS([issetugid]) > > There is no need to repeat AC_GNU_SOURCE. > > Andreas.
Thanks for pointing this out. There was already one repetition which confused me. --- libvtv/configure.ac | 3 ++- libvtv/vtv_utils.cc | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvtv/configure.ac b/libvtv/configure.ac index ba3009ee3fb..4d8cda9adaf 100644 --- a/libvtv/configure.ac +++ b/libvtv/configure.ac @@ -112,9 +112,10 @@ AC_SUBST(toolexeclibdir) AC_GNU_SOURCE AC_CHECK_FUNCS([__secure_getenv]) -AC_GNU_SOURCE AC_CHECK_FUNCS([secure_getenv]) +AC_CHECK_FUNCS([issetugid]) + AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getexecname __fortify_fail]) # Check for programs. diff --git a/libvtv/vtv_utils.cc b/libvtv/vtv_utils.cc index 1e41ced4473..10efee987d4 100644 --- a/libvtv/vtv_utils.cc +++ b/libvtv/vtv_utils.cc @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ #ifndef HAVE_SECURE_GETENV # ifdef HAVE___SECURE_GETENV # define secure_getenv __secure_getenv +# elif defined HAVE_ISSETUGID +# define secure_getenv(name) (issetugid() ? NULL : getenv(name)) # else # define secure_getenv getenv # endif -- 2.16.1
