Hi, On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michael Matz wrote: > > What is lost here (it wasn't explicit before, but is the case and must > > continue to work) is that function calls and returns count as needing the > > observable value in the specified register (function calls also count as > > setters of them). I think that should be made more explicit. > > It's no different from a normal variable in global scope. If the > compiler sees Yeah, that occured to me as well later :) Ignore me on that. Ciao, Michael.
