On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:53:27PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> 2018-04-15  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>
> 
>       PR testsuite/85326
>       * g++.dg/undef-bool-1.C:  New file.

Tests really shouldn't be added to g++.dg/ directly, but to subdirectories
thereof.
In this case, I think g++.dg/ext/undef-bool-1.C is the right location.
And see below.

Also, just a single space in between : and description in the ChangeLog
file.  Otherwise LGTM, but please wait for PowerPC maintainer ack.

>       * gcc.target/powerpc/powerpc.exp:  Remove .C support.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-1.C:  Remove file.
> 
> 
> Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/undef-bool-1.C
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/undef-bool-1.C       (nonexistent)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/undef-bool-1.C       (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c++11 -DNO_WARN_X86_INTRINSICS" } */

g++.dg/ tests are cycled through some or all -std= options, so
rather than -std=c++11 you should require effective target c++11,
or if you want to run it for -std=c++11 only and not others, c++11only.
Though in this testcase I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work even with
c++14, c++17 or c++2a.

        Jakub

Reply via email to