On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi again, > > On 22/03/2018 19:58, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Nice. While I start implementing the above, any hint about thing like > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist68.C, which we would reject because involves a plain > constructor of type ARRAY_TYPE, not a proper BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P? > Also, less important I guess, we would also reject g++.dg/torture/pr70499.C > to which you added -fpermissive in the occasion of c++/78345. Or maybe you > meant something a bit less drastic ;) > > I suspect that allowing for either BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P or > CONSTRUCTOR with a check of the type (like you changed build_vec_init at the > time: > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/cp/init.c?r1=246244&r2=246243&pathrev=246244 > ) would work fine.
Yes, that sounds good. And if pr70499.C fails, let's fix the testcase to add the missing braces. Jason
