On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:18:02PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> The patch is fairly slef-explanatory.
Well, it would be self-explanatory if I sent the
right patch. (Two pathces touch same file).
--
Steve
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 258571)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
@@ -1189,8 +1209,13 @@ get_proc_name (const char *name, gfc_symbol **result,
accessible names. */
if (sym->attr.flavor != 0
&& sym->attr.proc != 0
- && (sym->attr.subroutine || sym->attr.function)
+ && (sym->attr.subroutine || sym->attr.function || sym->attr.entry)
&& sym->attr.if_source != IFSRC_UNKNOWN)
+ gfc_error_now ("Procedure %qs at %C is already defined at %L",
+ name, &sym->declared_at);
+
+ if (sym->attr.flavor != 0
+ && sym->attr.entry && sym->attr.if_source != IFSRC_UNKNOWN)
gfc_error_now ("Procedure %qs at %C is already defined at %L",
name, &sym->declared_at);
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78741.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78741.f90 (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78741.f90 (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/78741
+! Contributed by Gerhard Steinmetz <gerhard.steinmetz.fortran at t-online.de>
+subroutine s(n, x)
+ integer :: n
+ character(n) :: x
+ character, pointer :: z(:)
+ x = 'a'
+ return
+entry g(n, x) ! { dg-error "is already defined" }
+ x = 'b'
+contains
+ subroutine g ! { dg-error "(1)" }
+ z(1) = x(1:1)
+ end
+end
