> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: > >> > What is the reason for using different names for return and indirect > >> > thunks at first place? > >> > > >> > >> These 2 thunks are identical. But one may want to provide an > >> alternate thunk only for > >> indirect branch and leaves return thunk alone. You can't do that if > >> both have the same > >> name. > > > > Hmm, OK, what is the benefit to have two different thunks? It is just > > safety precaution so we could adjust one without adjusting the other in > > future? > > > > That is correct.
Hmm, I guess the patch is OK. Things are slightly more flexible this way and duplicating thunk is not terribly expensive. One can always link with non-comdat+ alias. Honza > > > -- > H.J.
