On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 08:40 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote: > The patch makes 4 logically separable changes into one. It'd > be better to split it to 4 independent patches. > The changes except cmpgeusi_t look essentially OK to me. But > please test them as usual for both endian.
Sure, no problem. Will split and test and come back later in pieces. > I think that your observation is the case, i.e. almost all zero > special cases are already handled. The optimization intended > with the splitter will have a small chance but not zero, though. Yes, most likely. Will drop that change for now. Thanks, Oleg
