On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:36:31PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > That was my first patch, but it was rejected:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00271.html
> >
> > Then should we update fold_indirect_ref_1 to use the new code? Is
> > there a reason for them to stay out of sync?
>
> One of the reasons is that middle end uses poly_uint64 type but the front ends
> shouldn't use them. So some of these functions will unfortunately differ.
Yeah. Part of the patch makes the two implementations slightly more
similar, but I have e.g. no idea how to test for poly_uint64 that fits
also in poly_int64 and the poly_int* stuff makes the two substantially
different in any case.
Jakub
