* David Woodhouse: >> Do you assume that you will eventually apply run-time patching to >> thunks (in case they aren't needed)? > > "eventually"? We've been doing it for weeks. We are desperate to > release the kernel.... when can we have agreement on at *least* the > command line option and the name of the thunk? Internal implementation > details we really don't care about, but those we do.
Thanks. Are you content with patching just the thunk, or would you prefer patching the control transfer to it, too?
