On 12/30/2017 12:35 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: ---snip--- > > I can provide that stuff as a separate patch, or merge it into the > original megapatch and resubmit that, whichever way you prefer.
I would prefer we split into two patches. This will make review of the library I/O changes easier. The int len is used in a lot of places also where it really happens to also be the kind (which is a length in our implementation). Janne I trust your judgment about where it makes sense to change to size_t. On Thomas earlier comment about adding a pointer to void to hold space for async. I am OK with this too, though I am not convinced we have really defined our async objective here. More later on that topic. Regards, Jerry
