On 10/17/2011 12:56 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Thus clearly the documentation is wrong ;)
;-)
Not necessarily. Paolo does not say why that line was added.
I don't remember adding that line to change the default.
Indeed, as far as I can see, you added that line while *preserving* the
existing behavior and preparing the C++ variant of the pretty_print
machinery. Thus, AFAICS, 72 never existed anywhere and, strictly
speaking, there is nothing to *restore*.
But I may be wrong, I don't own viewcvs, I just quickly queried it.
Paolo.
