On 12/13/2017 12:25 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 12 December 2017 21:15:25 CET, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote:
Tested on x86_64-linux.
I assume this test worked even before this patch.
Of the tests added by the patch, strlenopt-37.c passes without
the compiler changes and strlenopt-36.c fails. Both are expected.
-37.c verifies the optimization doesn't happen when it shouldn't
happen and -36.c verifies it does take place when it's safe.
The regression test for the warning fails without the patch and
passes with the patch applied.
Thus:
s/oveflow/overflow/
Thanks. I'll fix that if/when the patch is approved.
Martin
thanks,
