On 12/07/2017 03:38 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> So I think that's the final ack on this series. > > Thanks to both of you, really appreciate it! Sorry it took so long.
> >> Richard S. can you confirm? I fully expect the trunk has moved some >> and the patches will need adjustments -- consider adjustments which >> work in a manner similar to the patches to date pre-approved. > > Yeah, that's now all of the poly_int patches. I still owe you replies > to some of them -- I'll get to that as soon as I can. NP. I don't think any of the questions were all that significant. Those which were I think you already responded to. > > I'll make the name changes and propagate through the series and then > commit this first patch. I was thinking that for the rest it would > make sense to commit them individually, with individual testing of > each patch, so that it's easier to bisect. I'll try to make sure > I don't repeat the merge mistake in the machine-mode series. > > I think it'd also make sense to divide the commits up into groups rather > than do them all at once, since it's easier to do the individual testing > that way. Does that sound OK? Your call on the best way to stage in. jeff
