On 10/14/2011 12:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: > I would rather change altivec_vperm_<mode> to use the new name (and also > altivec_vperm_<mode>_uns). But I can live with a wrapper function for now.
As I said, I'm leaving the cleanup of the old patterns to port maintainers. > If we are adding permute options, can we please get the vectorizer to use > optabs instead of using the targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm hook? It has > always struck me as a sore thumb that we have a hook that needs to return a > builtin function decl (targetm.vectorize.builtin_mask_for_load also). That's exactly what I've been working on today. r~
