On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 17:35 +0000, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I understood this, and my opinion is > that the AArch64 parts of this patch are OK (and I don't know who needs to > Ack the small generic changes you require). > > Let's give Richard/Marcus 48 hours to object while we wait for an OK on the > generic bits, and then OK for AArch64. > > Thanks, > James > > Reviewed-By: James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com>
James, I haven't seen anything from Richard or Marcus. Do you think a review from a global maintainer is really needed? There is no libatomic specific maintainer. The only non-aarch64 specific change is using the macro IFUNC_RESOLVER_ARGS in place of the hardcoded 'void' argument for ifunc selector functions and for all non-aarch64 platforms the macro will be defined as 'void' so there is no real change for any other platform. Steve Ellcey sell...@cavium.com
